Efficacy assessment of the clinical dermoscopy and vulvoscopy examination in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2022.160.16

Keywords:

squamous intraepithelial lesions of the vulva, dermoscopy, vulvoscopy, human papillomavirus

Abstract

High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the vulva of the usual type are associated with infection caused by human papillomavirus, while differentiated intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva develops most often on the background of vulvar lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in postmenopausal women. These types of intraepithelial neoplasia can be analyzed using dermoscopy and vulvoscopy methods.

Purpose - to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical dermatoscopy and vulvoscopic examination in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Materials and methods. This research paper presents the results of using dermoscopy and vulvoscopy examination methods, their comparison with the histological result and determining the most effective of these methods taking into account a higher probability of suspected precancerous lesions of the vulva.

Results. The study involved 170 patients who were examined in the outpatient department of the National Cancer Institute in 2017-2021. 100 (58.82%) patients were diagnosed with the usual type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, 70 (41.17%) patients - of the differentiated type.

Conclusions. The study results proved that dermoscopy was more exact to suspect precancer and a more accurate biopsy taking was fixed. The detection of НSIL was 98% in patients who underwent dermoscopy and those who had vulvoscopy - 75%, compared with histological findings.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.

No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.

References

Baliga SHA. (2012). Atlas of colposcopy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media: 248.

Barisani A, Dika E, Fanti PA, De Iaco P, Tosti G, Patrizi A et al. (2017). Dermoscopic findings of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a series of four cases. Br J Dermatol. 176 (1): 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14796; PMid:27291788

Bornstein J, Sideri M, Tatti S, Walker P, Prendiville W, Haefner HK. (2012). Terminology of the vulva of the Internationa Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 16 (3): 290-295. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825934c7; PMid:22659778

Bowling J. (2013). Diagnostic dermatoscopy. Illustrated guide. trans. with English under ed. A.A. Kubanovoy. Moscow: Panfilov Publishing House: BINOM. Knowledge laboratory: 160.

Dasgupta S, Ewing-Graham PC. (2018). Intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN): the most herokeratins 13 and 17. Virchows Arch. 473 (6): 739-747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2436-8; PMid:30187167 PMCid:PMC6267258

Errichetti E, Stinco G. (2015). The practical usefulness of dermoscopy in general dermatology. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 150 (5): 533-546.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. (2016). Dermoscopy in General Dermatology: A Practical Overview. Dermatol. Ther. (Heidelb). 6 (4): 471-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-016-0141-6; PMid:27613297 PMCid:PMC5120630

Errichetti E, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Apalla Z, Argenziano G, Bakos R et al. (2020). Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. Br. J. Dermatol. 182 (2): 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18125; PMid:31077336

Hoang LN, Park KJ, Soslow RA, Murali R. (2016). Squamous precursor lesions of the vulva: current classification and diagnostic challenges. Pathology. 48 (4): 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.02.015; PMid:27113549 PMCid:PMC5518939

Jin C, Liang S. (2019). Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Brief Review of Clinicopathologic Features. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 143 (6): 768-771. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0019-RS; PMid:30640512

Lewis N, Blanco LZ, Maniar KP. (2017). p16 Expression and biological behavior of flat vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). Int J Gynecol Pathol. 36 (5): 486-492. https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000364; PMid:28719486

McAlpine JN, Kim SY, Akbari A, Eshragh S, Reuschenbach M, von Knebel Doeberitz M et al. (2017). HPV-independent differentiated vulvar intraepithelial b, neoplasia (dVIN) is associated with an aggressive clinical course. Int. Gynecol. Pathol. 36 (6): 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000375; PMid:28319571

Ostergard S, Vorbeck CS, Meinert M. (2018). Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Ugeskr.Laeg. 80 (20): V12170931.

Swarts DRA, Voorham QJM, van Splunter AP, Wilting SM, Sieet D et al. (2018). Molecular heterogeneity in human papillomavirus-dependent and -independent vulvar carcinogenesis. Cancer Med. 7 (9): 4542-4553. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1633; PMid:30030907 PMCid:PMC6144162

Tosti G, Iacobone AD, Preti E, Vaccari S, Barisani A, Pennacchioli E et al. (2018). The role of photodynamic therapy in thetreatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Biomedicines. 6 (1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines6010013; PMid:29393881 PMCid:PMC5874670

Vaccari S, Barisani A, Preti EP, Dika E, Fanti PA, Patrizi A et al. (2018). Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: differential dermoscopic features in a case series, and a progression model. Clin Exp Dermatol. 43 (4): 469-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.13380; PMid:29315730

Van den Einden LC, de Hullu JA, Massuger LFAG, Grefte JMM, Bult P, Wiersma A et al. (2013). Interobserver variability and the effect of education in the histopathological diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 26 (6): 874-880. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.235; PMid:23370772

Published

2022-06-30