The role of ultrasonographic and elastographic predictors of labor induction effectiveness in nulliparous women with term premature rupture of membranes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2025.2(177).5762

Keywords:

labor induction, premature rupture of membranes, ultrasound elastography, logistic regression, Bishop score, ultrasonographic diagnostics

Abstract

Aim - to determine the role of ultrasonographic and elastographic parameters of the cervix in predicting the effectiveness of labor induction in nulliparous women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 79 nulliparous women with term PROM who underwent labor induction. Clinical and ultrasonographic data, including cervical length, morphometric parameters, and elastographic characteristics of the cervix, were collected before the onset of induction. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors for successful labor induction.

Results. Ultrasonographic and elastographic parameters of the cervix, including the hardness ratio, IOS/EOS ratio, cervical length, and estimated fetal weight, showed a significant association with the outcome of labor induction in nulliparous women with term PROM. Multivariate logistic regression models built using these parameters demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC>0.8), surpassing the prognostic value of the traditional Bishop score.

Conclusions. Ultrasound cervical elastography, combined with morphometric and clinical parameters, significantly improves the accuracy of predicting the effectiveness of labor induction in nulliparous women with term PROM compared to the traditional Bishop score.

The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the Committee on bioethics and deontology of these institutions. The informed consent of the children's parents was obtained for the research.

No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.

References

Bajpai N, Bhakta R, Kumar P, Rai L, Hebbar S. (2015, May). Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction. J Clin Diagn Res. 9(5): QC04-9. Epub 2015 May 1. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12315.5970; PMid:26155521 PMCid:PMC4484113

Bas Lando M, Majida E, Solnica A, Helman S, Margaliot Kalifa T e al. (2024). Nulliparas at Term with Premature Rupture of Membranes and an Unfavorable Cervix: Labor Induction with Prostaglandin or Oxytocin? A Retrospective Matched Case Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(12): 3384. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123384; PMid:38929913 PMCid:PMC11203933

Faltin-Traub EF, Boulvain M, Faltin DL, Extermann P, Irion O. (2004, Feb 10). Reliability of the Bishop score before labour induction at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 112(2): 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00336-1; PMid:14746954

Hong S-J, Jung Y-M, Hwang J-E, Lee K-S, Cho G-J, Oh M-J. (2025). Role of Cervical Elastography in Predicting Progression to Active Phase in Labor Induction in Term Nulliparous Women. Diagnostics. 15(4): 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040500; PMid:40002651 PMCid:PMC11854331

López Jiménez N, García Sánchez F, Pailos RH, Rodrigo Álvaro V, Pascual Pedreño A, Moreno Cid M et al. (2023, Apr 26). Prediction of an effective cervical ripenning in the induction of labour using vaginal dinoprostone. Sci Rep. 13(1): 6855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33974-7; PMid:37100837 PMCid:PMC10133331

Milatović S, Krsman A, Baturan B, Dragutinović Đ, Ilić Đ, Stajić D. (2024). Comparing Pre-Induction Ultrasound Parameters and the Bishop Score to Determine Whether Labor Induction Is Successful. Medicina. 60(7): 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071127; PMid:39064556 PMCid:PMC11278645

MOZ Ukrainy. (2023). Pro zatverdzhennia Standartu medychnoi dopomohy "Peredchasnyi rozryv plidnykh obolonok". Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy vid 25.08.2023 № 533. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1533282-23.

Pereira S, Frick AP, Poon LC, Zamprakou A, Nicolaides KH. (2014, Oct). Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 44(4): 468-475. Epub 2014 Aug 19. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13411; PMid:24832011

Quach D, Ten Eikelder M, Jozwiak M, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KWM et al. (2022, Jan). Maternal and fetal characteristics for predicting risk of Cesarean section following induction of labor: pooled analysis of PROBAAT trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 59(1): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24764; PMid:34490668

Published

2025-04-28